USPTO serial 77864277
CALNATURALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALNATURALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Hemp-based food beverage; dairy-based beverages; protein powders for human consumption for use as a food additive; hemp milk used as a milk substitute; quinoa and/or lupin beverages; non-dairy rice creamer; dairy-based food beverages; soups; soup broth; rice based whip cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chai and black teas; sauces; gluten-free sauces; gravies; tea-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soy-based and rice-based food beverage not being used as a milk substitute; horchata; soy-based fruit flavored beverages not being milk substitutes; non-alcoholic fruit flavored rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; flavored bottled waters; rice and quinoa based food beverages containing fruit blends not being milk substitutes; rice and quinoa based food beverages containing vegetable blends not being milk substitutes; fruit beverages; vegetable beverages, namely, vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Sake and sake-based wine coolers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by California Natural Products
- Other trademarks owned by California Natural Products
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CALNATURALE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |