Drawing for GREENTALK

USPTO serial 77867200

GREENTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. McLean, Esq.

Paul A. McLean, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)2000 University AveEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digital communication technology in the nature of an application programming interface (API) for software that enables real-time collaboration between electronic devices and their power sourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 7, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 7, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance