USPTO serial 77877042
PARIS BAGUETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARIS BAGUETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Walters
JAMES H. WALTERS PATENTTM.USPO BOX 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Coffee shop services; Restaurants; Snack-bars; Cafe; Cafeterias; Canteens services; Self-service restaurants; Food and drink catering; non-stop restaurant services provided at highway rest areas | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |