Drawing for M MAXWELL CERTIFIED INTEGRATOR

USPTO serial 77881138

M MAXWELL CERTIFIED INTEGRATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MAXWELL CERTIFIED INTEGRATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Hoisington, Esq.

Michael J. Hoisington, Esq. Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP401 West A StreetSuite 2600San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AEnergy storage modulesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 25, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance