Drawing for RECORD A STORY

USPTO serial 77909287

RECORD A STORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECORD A STORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason A. Finestone

JASON A FINESTONE SHUKAT ARROW HAFER WEBER AND HERBSMAN LLP111 WEST 57TH STREETSUITE 1120NEW YORK, NY 10019-2227

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Children's activity books, for use alone or with a battery-operated electronic device that enhances viewing of the books through audio meansACTIVEAug 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 29, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2012AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 23, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 22, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2012AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 25, 2012EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 26, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 26, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 4, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 4, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 4, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance