Drawing for ZEROIN

USPTO serial 77911688

ZEROIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEROIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald C. Lucas

DONALD C. LUCAS LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP15TH FL475 PARK AVE SNEW YORK, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial machine presses; machine tools for the processing of precision metal parts, namely, turning center, tapping center, milling machine, horizontal machine center, and vertical machine center; holding devices for machine tools, namely, chuck and jig fixture; metal punching machines; parts for machines, namely, punches for punching machines; tool holders for metalworking machines; mechanical presses for metalworking machines; drilling machines; milling machines; rolling mills; hydraulic presses for metalworking; shearing machines for metalworking; cutting machines for metalworking; pipe-forming machines for metalworking; slotting machines for metalworking; punching presses for metalworking; planning machines for metalworking; shaping machines for metalworking; honing machines for metalworking; rolling machines for rolling metals; machine presses; lapping machines for metalworking; laser cutting machines for metal working; Metal finishing machines; bending machines for metalworking; broaching machines for metalworking; lathes for metalworking; plastic processing machines, namely, blow-molders, extrusion machines, and injection molding machines; compression molding machines; grinding machines for metalworking; continuous metal casting machines; Wire forming machines; Electron beam machines, namely, presses using electron beams for guidance; engraving machines; foundry machinesACTIVE—
010Microwave sterilizers for medical useACTIVE—
011Microwave oven for domestic or industrial purposes; sterilizers for domestic or industrial purposes; microwave dental ovenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2011EAREEARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED—
Jun 27, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance