Drawing for ENVIEW

USPTO serial 77919460

ENVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Dreitler

JOSEPH R DREITLER DREITLER TRUE LLC137 E STATE STREETSUITE 102COLUMBUS, OH 43215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Camera controllers used to control medical camera in all types of medical proceduresABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 26, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 26, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2011OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 30, 2011LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 30, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance