Drawing for GRAY SEAM

USPTO serial 77919691

GRAY SEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAY SEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Shaw

BRIAN B. SHAW HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH AND LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Pre-fabricated ventilating ducts of metal having a factory sealed jointACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 28, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 15, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance