Drawing for ZERO CLICK

USPTO serial 77921651

ZERO CLICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZERO CLICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne M.J. Boisineau

LYNNE M.J. BOISINEAU MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500IRVINE, CA 92612-7108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that enables users to view merchandizing data and create, modify, configure, customize and utilize personalizable content at a single point of entryACTIVE—
035Business marketing services and providing business marketing information, namely, providing merchandizing and customer analytics data for purposes of analysis, reporting, and decision supportACTIVE—
042Providing on-line non-downloadable browser-enabled client interface software that allows a user to view merchandizing data and create, modify, configure, customize and utilize personalizable content and merchandizing analysis at a single point of entryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2015UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 6, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 17, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance