USPTO serial 77922634
STAAR MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2012
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with STAAR MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bulverde, TX
Bulverde, TX
Bulverde, TX
SPRING BRANCH, TX
BULVERDE, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrina G. Hull
Katrina G. Hull Markery Law LLCP.O. Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional booklets in the fields of mathematics, science, language arts, reading comprehension and social studies directed to K-12 students | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECS Learning Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ECS Learning Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ECS Learning Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTERIA LEARNING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTERIA EDUCATION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named STAAR MASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 4, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 4, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |