USPTO serial 77923028
INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4116332Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2012
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant T. Langton
Grant T. Langton Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.350 South Grand Ave., Suite 2600Two California PlazaLos Angeles, CA 90071-3406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bill payment services; Credit card and payment card services; Credit card payment processing services; Credit holder verification services; Credit holder authentication services; Credit holder information evaluation services; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic commerce business and personal credit verification services; Electronic commerce business, personal and transactional credit information gathering and/or evaluation services, namely, the Evaluation of the credit worthiness of companies and private individuals; Electronic foreign exchange business, personal and transactional credit information gathering and/or evaluation and/or processing, namely, the Evaluation of the credit worthiness of companies and private individuals in foreign exchange transactions; Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; Electronic payment services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of credit information; Electronic processing of insurance claims and payment data; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Providing electronic processing of automated clearing house (ACH) and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, automated clearing house (ACH), credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2009 |
| 038 | Providing electronic transmission of credit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2009 |
| 045 | Fraud detection services in the field of credit cards for on-line purchasing; Fraud detection services in the field of credit cards, debit cards, and payment cards for financial transactions; Fraud and identity theft protection services; Fraud detection services in the field of insurance, credit cards, banking and retail/financial transactions; Providing fraud detection services for electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network; Electronic commerce credit authentication services, namely, verification services for check, card, and electronic payment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |