CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL

USPTO serial 77930928

NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS MODEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Troy J. Cole

TROY J. COLE WOODARD, EMHARDT, MORIARTY, MCNETT & HENRY LLP111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for composing music, providing instruction in music, and providing visual entertainment in the nature of multimedia graphics derived from musical arrangementsACTIVE—
041Teaching in the field of music; entertainment services, namely, providing visual entertainment derived from musical arrangements in the nature of visual representation of musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance