USPTO serial 77940011
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
Winnipeg, CA
Other trademarks owned by OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
Winnipeg, CA
Other trademarks owned by OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
Winnipeg, CA
Other trademarks owned by OlaTech Business Hosting Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Lee
Jason R. Lee The Trademark Firm PLLC131 Franklin Plaza DrSuite 211Franklin, NC 28734| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for allowing data retrieval, upload, access and management; Application service provider featuring software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, web sites, and databases in the fields of personal productivity, wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; Cloud computing featuring software for use by associations to perform member data management, member communications, office management processes, products sales and product purchases; Computer network design and computer software design for the associations to access their data from any location with a functioning internet connection; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of managing associations; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer services, namely, providing a web-based system and online portal featuring on-line non-downloadable software that enables users to access training, education, testing and certification materials in the field of association management; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Design, development and consulting services in the field of software for content management; Providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software and applications for association management; Rental of application software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of association management; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use by associations to save, store, and or modify data owned by an association, or to save, store, and or modify data under the control of a third party who has been given rights over that data by the association which owns the data, and that this data is hosted at a server which is owned by the same entity which owns the server hosting the software; Software development and product development in the field association management; Software development in the field of association management | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 31, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |