USPTO serial 77952796
MADE CONSTRUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MADE CONSTRUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Davis
CHERYL L. DAVIS MENAKER & HERRMANN LLP10 E 40TH STNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction; Building construction and repair; Building construction services; Building construction supervision; Building construction, remodeling and repair; Building inspection; Constructing decks; Constructing porches; Constructing sunrooms; Construction and construction management of tunnels and underground structures; Construction and renovation of buildings; Construction and repair of buildings; Construction consultancy; Construction consultation; Construction dewatering, namely, the removal of surface waters and groundwater to facilitate the construction of structures and pipelines; Construction grading services; Construction management; Construction of buildings; Construction planning; Construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of commercial buildings; Construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of residential and commercial communities; Construction supervision; Construction, maintenance and renovation of property; Consultation in building construction supervision; Consulting in the field of building construction; Custom construction and building renovation; Custom construction of homes; General construction contracting; Housing services, namely, development of real property, namely, repair, improvement, and new construction; Housing services, namely, repair, improvement, and construction of residential real property; Real estate development and construction of commercial, residential and hotel property; Residential and building construction consulting; Residential and commercial building construction; Technical consultation in the field of building construction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |