USPTO serial 77966396
MYLAN GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2013
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MYLAN GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tra Vinh Province, VN
Tra Vinh Province, VN
Tra Vinh Province, VN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products used in optoelectronic and digital printing, laser imaging, stereo lithography, organic light emitting diodes and organic solar cells | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2013 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |