Drawing for TWO

USPTO serial 77967797

TWO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Frank

KAREN S. FRANK COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP1 FERRY BUILDING STE 200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beverages, namely, non-alcoholic carbonated beverages, flavored waters, lemonades, mineral water, vegetable juices, tomato juices, whey beverages, smoothies, fruit beverages, fruit-flavored beveragesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance