USPTO serial 77982131
AUDIENCE ON DEMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3999184Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2011
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AUDIENCE ON DEMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine Dennis Nye
Katherine Dennis Nye Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPTwo North LaSalle Street, Suite 1700Chicago, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services; Advertising and business services, namely, securing advertising space on all forms of media communications stations, systems, networks, and services for the purpose of promoting the goods and services of others; Advertising and promotion services and related consulting; Advertising by transmission of on-line publicity for third parties through electronic communications networks; Advertising services, namely, disseminating advertisements for the goods and services of others from a single interface to specific audiences through multiple communications means; Advertising services, namely, providing information as to the availability of advertising time or advertising space by facilitating relationships with, publishers, networks, and exchanges through which to place advertisements; Advertisement services provided to others via an online web site accessed through a global computer network; Business marketing consultation, namely, advice and information about customer services and product management and prices on Internet sites in connection with purchases made over the Internet; Business marketing consulting services; Computerized on-line ordering services in the field of advertising time and advertising space; Advertising services, namely, consolidation, organization, and provision of advertising space by electronic means and global information networks; Creation of marketing tools designed to increase awareness of likely consumers and dissemination of related promotional information; Digital media and mobile marketing buying and planning advice, namely, advising customers about advertising media; Dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network; Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; Targeting advertisements or promotions to a particular group of prospective consumers; Business marketing and advertising media business management services; Marketing consulting; On-line advertising on computer communication networks; On-line ordering services featuring advertising space available through electronic means and global information networks; Operating on-line marketplaces featuring the buying and selling of advertising space; Promoting the goods and services of others by distributing advertising and promotional materials from a single interface to specific audiences through a variety of advertising channels; Promoting the goods and services of others via a global computer network; Promotion and marketing services and related consulting; Providing information in the field of marketing and on- line marketing media via the Internet; Advertising information services, namely, providing information via an online web site as to the availability of publishers, networks, and exchanges through which to place advertisements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2008 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, design of computer hardware and software for disseminating advertising and promotional materials regarding the brands, goods, and services of others from a single interface to specific audiences via computer networks; Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others to use on-line ordering services featuring consolidation, organization, and provision of advertising space by electronic means and global information networks; Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for operating on-line marketplaces for buying and selling advertising space for others; Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others to buy and sell advertising space; Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others to order services in the field of advertising; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for consolidating, organizing, and provisioning advertising space; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for disseminating advertisements for others via an on-line communications network; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for disseminating advertisements for others via the Internet; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for distributing advertising materials from a single interface to specific audiences through a variety of advertising channels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |