CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PLAY2

USPTO serial 77983581

PLAY2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAY2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE 8TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games, video games and computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games, electronic games, computer games and video games; video arcade servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2020MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2020RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
May 14, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 14, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 27, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 8, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 7, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 31, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance