USPTO serial 78000346
SUN SAVVY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUN SAVVY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated mineral face powder | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |