USPTO serial 78006632
GRAHAM TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2924036Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAHAM TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RENFREWSHIRE, GB
Renfrewshire, GB
Glasgow, GB
Glasgow, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Dunn
MICHAEL L DUNN SIMPSON & SIMPSON PLLC5555 MAIN STWILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer software designed for use in business management of customer relations, namely for database management, accounting, inventory control, billing, and customer contact information management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2003 |
| 016 | Paper namely letterhead, note paper, blank forms and business forms; printed matter, namely books, booklets, pamphlets, instructional guides, instructional manuals, teaching materials, and brochures in the field of computer software for customer relations management; folders; printed paper signs; and publications namely, journals, newsletters, magazines and newspapers all such publications relating to the field of computer software for customer relations management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2003 |
| 021 | Porcelain cups, earthenware cups, porcelain mugs, earthenware mugs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2003 |
| 035 | Business management; business management consultation; and business marketing consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CIBOODLE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Graham Technology plc
- Other trademarks owned by Graham Technology plc
- Other trademarks owned by Graham Technology plc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GRAHAM TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |