USPTO serial 78012804
CHEF RANDALL'S CHOICE'S CONDIMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3039808Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEF RANDALL'S CHOICE'S CONDIMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cote Saint Luc, Quebec, CA
Cote Saint Luc, Quebec, CA
Cote Saint Luc, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRENT E. ROUTMAN
PETER J LYNFIELD ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB26TH FL150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen pre-prepared meals and fresh pre-prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; cheese, soups, jams, jellies, soup mixes, fruit sauces, cooking oils, potato chips and raisins, frozen vegetables; candied nuts; processed edible seeds; candied fruit snacks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2000 |
| 030 | Frozen pre-prepared meals and fresh pre-prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; spices, meat sauces, tomato sauces, mayonnaise, mustard and barbecue sauce, packaged mixes namely, cake mix, cookie mix, muffin mix, pancake mix, condensed sauces namely spaghetti sauce, tomato sauce, chocolate sauce, popped popcorn, chocolate-covered nuts, packaged flour, packaged cookies, tortilla chips, pretzels, chocolate bars, hard candies, bagels, tarts, and packaged rice; Granola-based snack bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cornfield, Randall R.
- Other trademarks owned by Cornfield, Randall R.
- Other trademarks owned by Cornfield, Randall R.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHEF RANDALL'S CHOICE'S CONDIMENTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |