USPTO serial 78014844
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Raritan, NJ 08869UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Medical e-commerce software downloadable from an on-line data repository or database or from any form of media including digital and electronic files and data, disks, DVDs, magnetic tapes, optical disks and CD-ROMs to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |