USPTO serial 78016429
TECHTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2837139Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2004
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Universal City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monique Cheng Joe
Monique Cheng Joe NBCUniversal Media, LLC100 Universal City PlazaBldg. 1280, 6th FloorUniversal City, CA 91608Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [TELEVISION BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION SERVICES; CABLE TELEVISION BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION SERVICES; CABLE RADIO BROADCASTING AND TRANSMISSION SERVICES;] BROADCASTING OF PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2000 |
| 041 | [PROGRAMMING OF TELEVISION SHOWS; PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION SHOWS; AN ONGOING SERIES OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND NEWS;] PROVIDING TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND NEWS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2000 |
| 042 | [ Providing information and information technology news via a global computer information network to assist in the development of new technology in the fields of computers, software and new electronic technology ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G4 MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZDTV LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ZDTV LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TECHTV, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TECHTV, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by G4 MEDIA, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TECHTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |