USPTO serial 78018153
SATIN TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATIN TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 40002425 W OLYMPIC BLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | personal lubricants, male genital desensitizers, and douches | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electric and non-electric massage devices and accessories for massaging or vibrating portions of the face and body; imitation sexual organs, namely, penises, penises and testicles, vaginas and breasts; devices for aiding in sexual intercourse and masturbation, namely, reproductions of parts of the male and female anatony and life-sized anatomically correct mannequins; stimulation devices for aiding in sexual arousal and sexual performance; vibrators and vibrator sleeves; condoms; constrictor rings for use to maintain erections; and vacuum pumps and accessories, namely a cylinder, sleeve, cushion inserts, constrictor rings and constrictor ring loaders for use to maintain penile rigidity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |