USPTO serial 78030098
THE LAST KILLER APP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LAST KILLER APP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. GREENWALD
MICHAEL J MEHRMAN MEHRMAN LAW OFFICE PC5605 GLENRIDGE DR STE 795ATLANTA, GA 30342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized on-line retail services in the field of general merchandise such as books, clothing, computers, software, gifts, music, videos, electronics, music and video equipment, and magazines; information services for retail shoppers including promoting on-line retail shopping services of others through advertising and the operation of an on-line web site; providing links to on-line retail stores; on-line ordering service via computer networks and global communication networks; providing on-line information in the field of business, business management and advertising services for others; retail services, namely, on-line shopping service for computers, computer software, computer components, and computer peripherals; on-line yellow pages services; on-line classified advertising services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |