Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78031449?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78031449. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns POETIC JUSTICE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78031449, the listed owner(s) include: Poetic Justice International.

What is USPTO serial number 78031449?

Serial number 78031449 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark POETIC JUSTICE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of POETIC JUSTICE?

POETIC JUSTICE (78031449) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover POETIC JUSTICE?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78031449

POETIC JUSTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Oct 19, 2000
Status date: Aug 30, 2005
Registration date: —
Examiner: KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office: OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POETIC JUSTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Poetic Justice International
Concord, NH
Other trademarks owned by Poetic Justice International

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert H. Rines

ROBERT H RINES RINES & RINES24 WARREN STCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	television production services for dissemination via television and global computer networks	ACTIVE	Sep 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 1, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Aug 25, 2005	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
May 11, 2005	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
May 11, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 4, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 1, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 1, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 6, 2004	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Oct 6, 2004	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 16, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 2, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 2, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 15, 2004	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Jun 3, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 3, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 16, 2004	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Feb 18, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 3, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Jan 26, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 26, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 12, 2003	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Feb 10, 2003	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Feb 10, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 26, 2002	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 8, 2002	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 27, 2001	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 22, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 10, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 10, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—