USPTO serial 78036165
SHANI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHANI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Bernstein
MICHAEL BERNSTEIN BERNSTEIN, WEISS & SCHWARTZ, LLP160 BROADWAY STE 1010NEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 014 | COSTUME JEWELRY, NAMELY, RINGS, (EARRINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES AND PINS, NAMELY BROOCHES MADE FROM RHINESTONES, CRYSTALS, SILVER AND GOLD PLATE | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 018 | ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HANDBAGS, DAY BAGS, NAMELY HANDBAGS AND POCKETBOOK MADE FROM SUEDE, LEATHER AND ANIMAL FUR (NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC), EVENING BAGS, NAMELY POCKETBOOKS AND HANDBAGS MADE FROM SILK, SATIN AND CRYSTAL | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 025 | WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, DESIGNER DAY DRESSES, DAY JACKETS, DESIGNER EVENING DRESSES, NAMELY DESIGNER EVENING GOWNS, EVENING JACKETS, SUITS, PANTS, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, SWEATERS, SHOES, HATS, OVERCOATS, JACKETS | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grosz, Susan, Shani
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SHANI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |