USPTO serial 78037447
MERILUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERILUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W BAILEY
THOMAS W BAILEY OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA480 THE STATION601 W CORDOVA STVANCOUVER, BC V6B 1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) computer software for network security management, network routing and firewall applications; Internet access gateway software for networking, network security and digital interconnectivity; computer software used for communication over a global computer network; computer software for enabling development of virtual private networks and allocation of bandwidth (Based on Intent to Use) computer hardware for networking, network security and digital interconnectivity; (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) computer software for network security management, network routing and firewall applications; Internet access gateway software and equipment for networking, network security and digital interconnectivity; computer software and hardware used for communication over a global computer network; computer software for enabling development of virtual private networks and allocation of bandwidth | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2000 |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) computer software development services relating to network security management, Internet access gateways, network routing, virtual private networks, customized networks for e-commerce applications, high-speed bandwidth allocation, shaping and customized computer operating system applications and distributed security services(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) computer software development and consulting services relating to network security management, Internet access gateways, network routing, virtual private networks, customized networks for e-commerce applications, high-speed bandwidth allocation, shaping and customized Linux-based computer applications and distributed security services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |