USPTO serial 78039703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dan Pollmann
BRIAN M MATTSON PATENTS+TMS2849 W ARMITAGE AVECHICAGO, IL 60647UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically encoded credit cards | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | credit cards without magnetic coding | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | providing bank account information by telephone, banking, bill payment services, credit recovery and collection, electronic credit card transactions, electronic debit transactions, electronic funds transfer, financing services, check processing, evaluation of credit bureau data, credit card services, credit card transaction processing services | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |