USPTO serial 78045017
AVALANCHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVALANCHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristine M. Miller
KRISTINE M MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80202-3950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | OUTSOURCING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY, NAMELY PROVIDING TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT LABOR AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIELD | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2000 |
| 042 | INTEGRATION OF SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; IMPLEMENTATION OF SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; POST - IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT OF SYSTEMS AND NET WORKS, NAMELY TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NAMELY MONITORING OF NETWORK SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION CONSULTING SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT, AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |