USPTO serial 78047989
ASPN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASPN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
St. Michael, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M YANG
SALLY WHITEHEAD C/O SOPHOSACTIVESTATE CORPORATION6 KIMBALL LNLYNNFIELD, MA 01940Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, namely utility programs and programs to assist developers in the creation and modification of other computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Publications, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, magazines~ books, instruction manuals, user guides and reference guides in the field of computers, software, and the development of computer systems and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Organizing, arranging, conducting and promoting of wade shows, exhibitions and business conferences in the fields of computer software and the development of computer programs and systems; wholesale distribution of computer programs for use by computer consultants and developers and maintainers of computer software and computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information to computer consultants and computer software developers used to develop computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Activestate SRL
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASPN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |