USPTO serial 78053495
PANPHYTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANPHYTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Malutta
ANTHONY J MALUTTA TOWNSEND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and biological preparations and compounds, for medical purposes, and for medical use for human purposes, for the prevention, deterrence and treatment of cancer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing laboratory research for others in the field of pharmaceutical and biological preparations and compounds; provide consultation services in the field of pharmaceutical and biological preparations and compounds and product research and development; and provide medical and scientific research for others, namely, pre-clinical studies and clinical trials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |