Drawing for PATENTS.COM

USPTO serial 78061755

PATENTS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATENTS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl Oppedahl

Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for managing a database of records and for tracking the status of the records by means of the InternetACTIVEDec 9, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 12, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 10, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 10, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance