USPTO serial 78063326
IWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BEVERLEE G. STEINBERG
BEVERLEE G STEINBERG SHELL OIL COMPANYP O BOX 2463HOUSTON, TX 77252-2463UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OIL, GAS AND INJECTION WELL CONTROL SYSTEMS; BEING HYDRAULIC, ELECTRIC, FIBER OPTIC AND CABLE-LESS/LOW POWER ACTIVATED OR ACOUSTIC AND RADIO ACTIVATED; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY SENSORS, DEFECTORS, MICROPROCESSORS, RECEIVERS, TRANSMITTERS AND CONTROLLERS; AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; FOR USE IN RESERVOIR MONITORING, IMAGING, PRODUCTION MONITORING, CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OF OIL, GAS INJECTION WELLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION; NAMELY, CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO THE COMPLETION OF WELLS USING HYDRAULIC, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, FIBER OPTIC AND CABLE-LESS/LOW POWER ACTIVATED OR ACOUSTIC AND RADIO ACTIVATED; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY SENSORS, DEFECTORS, MICROPROCESSORS, RECEIVERS, TRANSMITTERS AND CONTROLLERS; AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |