USPTO serial 78079135
MEZZA LUNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEZZA LUNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Port Coquitlam, CA
Port Coquitlam, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY C. NELSON
BARRY C NELSON BROWN RUDNICK BERLACK ISRAELS LLPBOX IP 18TH FL ONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Wine making kits consisting primarily of fruit juice concentrates and chemical additives, and which may contain sulphur dioxide, liquid invert sugar, diammonium phosphate, citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, bentonite, potassium sorbate, yeast, potassium metabisulphite, oak extract, oak chips, herbs, elderflowers, elderberries, tannin, sodium benzoate, glucose, isinglass, chitosan, gelatine, kieselsol, labels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |