USPTO serial 78080590
DAYCLOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2003
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DAYCLOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley Paul Elley, Esq.
BRADLEY PAUL ELLEY ESQ BRADLEY PAUL ELLEY ESQ120 COUNTRY CLUB DR STE 25INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451-9321UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Clocks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |