Drawing for TXU ENERGY SENTINEL

USPTO serial 78084714

TXU ENERGY SENTINEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TXU ENERGY SENTINEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Pinkerton

JOHN P PINKERTON HUNTON & WILLIAMS1601 BRYAN ST 30TH FLENERGY PLZDALLAS, TX 75201-3401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042MONITORING AND CONTROLLING ENERGY AND ASSET INFORMATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PERFORMING ELECTRICITY AND GAS DATA ANALYSES, AND REMOTELY OPERATING HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR-CONDITIONING, REFRIGERATION, BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS VIA AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER NETWORKABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 8, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 8, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 8, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance