USPTO serial 78084714
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Pinkerton
JOHN P PINKERTON HUNTON & WILLIAMS1601 BRYAN ST 30TH FLENERGY PLZDALLAS, TX 75201-3401| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MONITORING AND CONTROLLING ENERGY AND ASSET INFORMATION SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PERFORMING ELECTRICITY AND GAS DATA ANALYSES, AND REMOTELY OPERATING HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR-CONDITIONING, REFRIGERATION, BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS VIA AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |