USPTO serial 78091434
CARMELINA 'E ... SAN MARZANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2004
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CARMELINA 'E ... SAN MARZANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvine, CA
MISSION VIEJO, CA
MISSION VIEJO, CA
MISSION VIEJO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric L. Tanezaki
Eric L. Tanezaki STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNED, COOKED AND OTHERWISE PROCESSED TOMATOES | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MANGIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MANGIA IMPORTS INC
- Other trademarks owned by MANGIA IMPORTS INC
- Other trademarks owned by MANGIA IMPORTS INC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CARMELINA 'E ... SAN MARZANO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 1, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 31, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |