Drawing for CONNECTIONS THAT MATTER

USPTO serial 78096681

CONNECTIONS THAT MATTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNECTIONS THAT MATTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Boney Denison

MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for telecommunications, namely, application software for administration of wireless services and delivery of Internet content into carrier networks for wireless service providers, computer telephony software, software allowing location-based information to be transmitted to and from mobile devices, software for enhanced location identification and positioning in the field of wireless telecommunications, software for providing emergency location information and enhanced connectivity for emergency calls from a wireless communications network, software for sending and retrieving electronic mail from multiple electronic mail accounts, software used to provide access to a global computer network and telephone networks to enable text messaging, paging and telephone service, wireless messaging software, wireless emergency messaging software, software allowing location-based and presence-based information to be gathered, determined, managed, protected, and transmitted to and from mobile devices, end user applications and platforms, software allowing rapid presence and location-based application development, software permitting network interfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 9, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance