USPTO serial 78096681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Boney Denison
MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for telecommunications, namely, application software for administration of wireless services and delivery of Internet content into carrier networks for wireless service providers, computer telephony software, software allowing location-based information to be transmitted to and from mobile devices, software for enhanced location identification and positioning in the field of wireless telecommunications, software for providing emergency location information and enhanced connectivity for emergency calls from a wireless communications network, software for sending and retrieving electronic mail from multiple electronic mail accounts, software used to provide access to a global computer network and telephone networks to enable text messaging, paging and telephone service, wireless messaging software, wireless emergency messaging software, software allowing location-based and presence-based information to be gathered, determined, managed, protected, and transmitted to and from mobile devices, end user applications and platforms, software allowing rapid presence and location-based application development, software permitting network interfaces | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |