USPTO serial 78103731
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Falls Church, VA
Falls Church, VA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in organizing and linking web-based html and xml documents | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |