USPTO serial 78110954
BLUE FOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE FOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo Notaro
NOTARO & MICHALOS PC NOTARO & MICHALOS PC100 DUTCH HILL RD STE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962-2100UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |