USPTO serial 78112750
DIANABOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIANABOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur W. Leach
Arthur W. Leach The Law Office of Arthur W. Leach5780 Windward Parkway, Suite 225Alpharetta, GA 30005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | G & S: MARK IS USED FOR THE SALE AND IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC VITAMIN AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; G & S: MARK IS USED FOR THE SALE AND IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC VITAMIN AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |