USPTO serial 78113126
EZY-RAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZY-RAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Granite Bay, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. O'BANION
JOHN P O'BANION O'BANION & RITCHEY LLP400 CAPITOL MALL STE 1550SACRAMENTO, CA 95814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | LAWN AND GARDEN RAKE THAT HAS A BUILT-IN RETRACTABLE GRASPING DEVISE THAT ALLOWS THE USER TO PICK UP THE RAKE DEBRIS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |