Drawing for WAVESIGHT

USPTO serial 78115400

WAVESIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WAVESIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software used for the operation of medical and aesthetic lasers and light-based devicesABANDONED—
010Medical and aesthetic lasers and light-based devices used for medical and aesthetic treatments and structural and replacement parts therefore.ABANDONED—
037Installation, repair, maintenance for medical and aesthetic lasers and light-based devices, systems and accessories and components thereforABANDONED—
041Training in the use and operation of laser and other light-based systems For medical and aesthetic useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 6, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 8, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance