USPTO serial 78121487
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley M. Ganz
BRADLEY M GANZ GANZ LAW PCPO BOX 2200HILLSBORO, OR 97123UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for evaluating and comparing records in a database, namely, a general purpose database evaluation system for identifying items in a database that match objective and subjective requirements of users; computer software and hardware for creating graphical computerized user interfaces for evaluating and comparing records in a database; computer software for comparison and research of goods and services for sale to consumers; computer software for research and comparison of goods and services in the field of motor vehicles; computer software and hardware for creating graphical computerized user interfaces for searching databases of information about goods and services for sale to consumers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | consumer research services, namely computerized comparison and research of goods and services for sale to consumers; consumer research services, namely computerized research and comparison of goods and services in the field of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data over a computer network; computer software design for others; computer consultation services, namely, providing electronic user interfaces for searching databases of information about goods and services for sale to consumers; providing temporary use of non-downloadable search engine software for use in searching databases featuring information about goods and services for safe to consumers; providing temporary use of non-downloadable search engine software for use in searching databases featuring information in the field of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |