USPTO serial 78124218
RIBOPHERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIBOPHERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
95326 Kulmbach, DE
95326 Kulmbach, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Chemicals, namely, organic molecules that interfere with predetermined genetic sequences in cells of living matter, thereby inhibiting or enhancing expression of a predetermined gene, and organic or inorganic chemicals which function as helpers to introduce the organic molecules into the cells of living matter, used in industry, science, agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and in chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e) Priority Application) Pharmaceutical, veterinary, sanitaryand dietetic preparations for medical use, all consisting primarily of organic molecules that interfere with predetermined genetic sequences in cells of living matter, thereby inhibiting or enhancing expression of a predetermined gene and chemicals which function as helpers to introduce these molecules into the cells of such matter; food for babies, medical plasters, wound and surgical dressings, materials for stopping teeth, dental wax, disinfectants for medical instruments; preparations for destroying vermin, fungicides, for domestic and agricultural use; herbicides for domestic and agricultural use | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e) Priority Application) (Based on 44(e)) Scientific and industrial research; pharmaceutical research; veterinary and agriculture services, namely development of substances against diseases of plants and for genetic modification of plants; services of biologists, namely development of substances for the therapy of diseases; characterization of the function of genes; chemist services; services of biochemist, namely development for others of substances against diseases of plants and for genetic modification of plants; services of biologists, namely development of substances for others for the therapy of diseases and for characterization of the function of genes; chemist services; services of biochemist, namely development of substances for others for the therapy of diseases and characterization of the function of genes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ribopharma AG
- Other trademarks owned by Ribopharma AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RIBOPHERENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |