USPTO serial 78139491
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Frederick, MD
Frederick, MD
Frederick, MD
FORT MYERS, FL
NAPLES, FL
NAPLES, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie N. Pitts
Jamie N. Pitts The Law Office of Jamie N. Pitts, Esq. P.A.887 WEST MARIETTA STREET, NWSUITE M-105ATLANTA, GA 30318| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters and research reports in the field of financial information pertaining to all types of payment cards, namely, credit cards, debit cards, smart cards, prepaid cards, ATM cards, loyalty cards and phone cards for the use of consumers and professionals in the payment card industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1995 |
| 041 | On-line publication in the nature of research reports in the field of information for the use of consumers and professionals in the payment card industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |