Drawing for STRAWBERRY SHORTCAKE

USPTO serial 78145691

STRAWBERRY SHORTCAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3171964Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2006
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with STRAWBERRY SHORTCAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025socks, tights, shoes, sandals, slippers, boots, belts, hats, gloves, scarves, panties, dresses, pants, shorts, swimsuits, Halloween costumes, wrist bandsACTIVEMar 31, 2004
026hair clips, barrettes, hair bands, ponytail holders, ribbons and bows for gift wrapping [, cloth patches for clothing, shoe laces ]ACTIVEAug 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 24, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 24, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 9, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 10, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 24, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Nov 24, 2015EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2015EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 11, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 1, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 11, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2012815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 14, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 5, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 22, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 28, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance