Drawing for YOGABABY

USPTO serial 78147938

YOGABABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOGABABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin Kitzes Silk

TODD BRAVERMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Calendars, diaries, personal writing journals, dream journals, date books, notebooks, note paper, note pads, stationery, posters, greeting cards, newsletters in the field of infant care and child care, periodicals, namely, magazines, in the field of infant care and childcare, journals in the field of infant care and child careACTIVE—
024Bed linens, namely, sheets, pillow cases, bed shams, pillow shams, duvet covers, blankets, throws, afghans, quilts, comforters;curtains, textile place mats, table linens, tablecloths not of paper, textile napkins, towels, washcloths, shower curtainsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, T-shirts, bathrobes, bathing suits, lingerie, bras, panties, slips, camisoles, pajamas, nightgowns, negligees; workout clothing, namely, tights and leotards; bandanas, shorts, pants, dresses, skirts, shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, socks, gloves, hats, caps, visors, baby buntings, shoes, boots, belts, cloth eating bibs for babiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 25, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 7, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance