Drawing for THINKING OUT LOUD

USPTO serial 78167046

THINKING OUT LOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINKING OUT LOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nate A. Garhart

NATE A GARHART COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP222 KEARNY ST 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108-4510UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting global forums, city-based forums, classes, seminars and workshops in the fields of personal and organizational leadership, personal and professional success, creativity, innovation, reinvention, self-awareness, self-improvement, enlightenment, and multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches to problem solving, all in relation to personal and global issues; entertainment media production, namely, television show production, motion picture film production, radio entertainment production, multimedia entertainment software production, music production services, theater productions, on-line interactive exhibits in the fields of personal and organizational leadership, personal and professional success, creativity, innovation, reinvention, self-awareness, self-improvement, enlightenment, and multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches to problem solving, all in relation to personal and global issuesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance